Negotiation X Monster ⭐

| Violation | Classical Assumption | Monster Behavior | Example | |-----------|----------------------|------------------|---------| | | Concessions beget concessions | Unilateral demand escalation | Loan shark doubling interest mid-payment | | Mortality | Long-term consequences matter | No future to constrain present | Suicidal terrorist demanding ransom | | Legibility | Preferences are stable and knowable | Utility function is hidden or random | AI that values paperclips over human life |

Thus, Negotiation X Monster is not a subfield—it is a rupture. When the counterparty’s utility function is orthogonal to yours, or worse, non-existent, negotiation becomes something else entirely: existential triage. We identify three fundamental violations that constitute a “monster” in negotiation terms: Negotiation X Monster